Shan-ul-Hai

Decide Based On Credentials... Not Faces



Posted: Monday, June 23, 2008

by Shan-ul-Hai
Globally Rational

Back in February 2007, USA Today/Gallup asked Americans the following question:

"Between now and the 2008 political conventions, there will be discussion about the qualifications of presidential candidates -- their education, age, religion, race, and so on. If your party nominated a generally well-qualified person for president who happened to be 72 years old, would you vote for that person?"

42% of people said "no" and 15% were undecided. That means that if their party nominated a 72 year-old, 3 out of 7 people would vote for somebody else. In the same poll, 48-50% of people supported Obama or Hillary in a November election against McCain. That would lead a person to believe that, since 42% of people should technically vote against McCain solely because of his age, only 6-8% of people actually supported Obama or Hillary. In fact, I think it's much easier to vote for McCain when you attach a name to his age... people were averse to voting for a 72 year-old, but plenty of people were willing to vote for McCain.

Are we serious? In a perfect world, I think we'd remove all of the faces from political elections. If we only knew a candidate's political stances and credentials (and we never saw their faces until after they get elected), I think more people would dismiss McCain just because they don't want to vote for a guy who'd be 80 years old by the time he finishes his second term. What do you think?

I like looking at data and studies... they cast a lot of light on reality. I've noticed plenty of people say things like "I don't care about the numbers, this is what my experience says"... but I don't think that any single person's experience is as valuable as the experience of the thousands of people involved in the study. If we weren't willing to vote for a 72 year-old, then why were we willing to vote for McCain?

I like McCain... I won't vote for him (not because of his age, but because of his stance on the issues), but I do like him. I think that he's better than Hillary and that he's not as good as Obama... but that's irrelevant. The question here is about numbers; if we weren't willing to vote for a 72 year-old, then why were we willing to vote for McCain?

This Article has been viewed 305 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (1 total)
» left by jamespkrehbiel
from scottsdale, az 3 years 325 days ago.
Shan, To further your argument, how many people in that same poll will not vote for a candidate strickly because he/she is Black? It doesn't matter about issues to these people. These a the "low information" voters. They fly by the seat of their pants. Qualifications and issues are of little consequence. Great article!
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.